Resolution Systems InstituteResolution Systems InstituteMenuDonate
  • Home
  • About
    • Overview
    • Mission
    • People
    • History
    • Awards
    • Careers
    • Support RSI
  • Services
    • Program Administration
    • Program Design
    • Research and Evaluation
  • Our Impact
    • Child Protection Mediation
    • Evaluation of a Child Protection Mediation Program
    • Eviction Mediation
    • Foreclosure Mediation
  • Resource Center
    • Overview
    • Court ADR Basics
    • Guide to Program Success
    • Mediation Efficacy Studies
    • Model Surveys
    • The OPEN Project: ODR Party Engagement
    • Peer Review Tools
    • Special Topics
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Donate
  • Topics by Profession
    • For Judges
    • For Lawyers
    • For Legal Aid
    • For Neutrals
    • For Program Administrators
    • For the Public
  • Topics by Subject
    • Child Protection Mediation
      • Child Protection and Mediation Background
      • Program Design and Implementation
      • Child Protection Mediation Studies
    • Community Mediation
      • Community Mediation Basics
      • Courts and Community Mediation
      • Tracking and Evaluating Mediation Services
      • Exemplary Studies
    • Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility
      • Basics
      • DEIA in Court ADR Programs
      • Communications
      • Accessibility
      • Neutral Diversity
      • Evaluating DEIA
      • Conclusion
      • Additional Resources
    • Eviction Mediation
      • Overview
      • Considerations & Guidance
      • National Eviction Resources
    • Foreclosure Mediation
      • RSI Resources
      • Foundational Resources
      • Additional Resources
    • Online Dispute Resolution
      • What Is ODR
      • History of ODR
      • ODR Considerations for Courts
      • RSI Publications on ODR
      • Additional Resources
    • Restorative Justice
      • What Is Restorative Justice
      • Examples of Restorative Justice Practices
      • Selected Resources

Diversity, Equity, Inclusion & Accessibility

Neutral Diversity

Show Sidebar

Courts’ inherent responsibility to administer justice fairly is shared by the ADR programs to which the court sends cases. It is important, therefore, that the public have an experience that is welcoming, fair and accessible when they use the ADR program. One way a program may work to accomplish this is to offer diverse neutrals who reflect the parties who use the program.

Diversifying Rosters of Neutrals

Interested programs might start by examining the demographics of their current roster (including, for example, diversity with respect to age, race, gender and disability) and comparing it to the parties who use the ADR program. This can help the program identify any potential gaps. Two areas to consider when seeking to diversity a roster of neutrals are recruitment and qualifications.

Recruitment

To diversify their rosters, ADR programs can actively recruit neutrals who are diverse. In larger jurisdictions this recruitment could include working with specialized bar associations, such as those whose membership is composed of lawyers from particular racial groups and those who identify as LGBTQ or a particular ethnicity. Local law schools and recent graduates may be a source of more diversity, as the legal profession becomes more diverse. Current neutrals from diverse backgrounds might also be interested in assisting the ADR program in reaching out to organizations or to individuals that can help diversify the roster.

To diversify rosters in programs that rely on volunteer mediators, ADR programs might conduct outreach to community groups, houses of worship and other social service agencies. Providing opportunities for volunteers to mediate outside the usual workweek may open the program to more participants, too.

Qualifications

Courts seeking to increase neutral diversity might revisit their qualifications and consider adjusting the scope of their educational and work experience requirements for neutrals. For example, a law license is unlikely to be necessary to mediate small claims matters in most jurisdictions – although it might be required – and it is likely to limit the diversity of mediators. Similarly, adjusting the criteria for family mediators to include those with degrees in social work, psychology or other family-related areas of study, may help in diversifying a mediator roster.

In 2018, the American Bar Association’s Resolution 105 noted the lack of diversity among neutrals and made recommendations for change. The action steps included with the resolution may provide helpful tips for court ADR programs.

Additional Resource

  • Ten Ways to Increase Diversity and Inclusion in Court-Annexed ADR: Written by Robyn Weinstein, this article provides a list of ten suggestions court ADR programs can utilize to improve diversity and inclusion among their roster of neutrals. 

 

11 E Adams Street, Suite 500, Chicago, IL 60603

  • 312.922.6475
  • info@aboutrsi.org
  • © 1998-2025 RSI
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

To give you the best possible experience, this site uses cookies. If you continue browsing, you accept our use of cookies and agree to our Disclaimer, Privacy & Copyright policy.

Learn More