Resolution Systems InstituteResolution Systems InstituteMenuDonate
  • Home
  • About
    • Overview
    • Mission
    • People
    • History
    • Awards
    • Careers
    • Support RSI
  • Services
    • Program Administration
    • Program Design
    • Research and Evaluation
  • Our Impact
    • Child Protection Mediation
    • Evaluation of a Child Protection Mediation Program
    • Eviction Mediation
    • Foreclosure Mediation
  • Resource Center
    • Overview
    • Court ADR Basics
    • Guide to Program Success
    • Mediation Efficacy Studies
    • Model Surveys
    • The OPEN Project: ODR Party Engagement
    • Peer Review Tools
    • Special Topics
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Donate
Combined ShapeBack to search results

Alternative Dispute Resolution in a Bankruptcy Court: The Mediation Program in the Southern District of California

Hartwell, Steven; Bermant, Gordon. Jan. 1, 1988

Description of Study: Study looking at judge and attorney attitudes toward the mediation program, including whether mediation saved their clients time and money.

Method: Interviewed judges, court clerk, mediators, and lawyers. Examined case files of all cases sent to mediation over 15 months.

Comparative: No

Sample Size: 80 Cases

Variables Examined: Opinions of judges, mediators, and lawyers regarding how well the program was functioning, what cases were amenable to mediation, whether mediation saved litigants time or money

Program Variables: The program was voluntary, with cases referred by the judge. Mediators were volunteers who were experienced bankruptcy attorneys with no mediation training; attorneys chose the mediator. The program had been newly established at the time of the study. The mediation process used was evaluative, with parties present only at the opening statement.

Case types: Bankruptcy

Findings: Attorneys believed that mediation saved their and their clients' time and saved their clients money. The mediation program was found to move proceedings off the pretrial status conference calendars. Cases attorneys thought to be amenable to mediation were those involving small amounts of money, cases with limited issues that dealt with fact, and cases in which extensive discovery had not yet been done.

11 E Adams Street, Suite 500, Chicago, IL 60603

  • 312.922.6475
  • info@aboutrsi.org
  • © 1998-2025 RSI
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

To give you the best possible experience, this site uses cookies. If you continue browsing, you accept our use of cookies and agree to our Disclaimer, Privacy & Copyright policy.

Learn More