Resolution Systems InstituteResolution Systems InstituteMenuDonate
  • Home
  • About
    • Overview
    • Mission
    • People
    • History
    • Awards
    • Careers
    • Support RSI
  • Services
    • Program Administration
    • Program Design
    • Research and Evaluation
  • Our Impact
    • Child Protection Mediation
    • Evaluation of a Child Protection Mediation Program
    • Eviction Mediation
    • Foreclosure Mediation
  • Resource Center
    • Overview
    • Court ADR Basics
    • Guide to Program Success
    • Mediation Efficacy Studies
    • Model Surveys
    • The OPEN Project: ODR Party Engagement
    • Peer Review Tools
    • Special Topics
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Donate
Combined ShapeBack to search results

What if the Lawyers Have Their Way? An Empirical Assessment of Conflict Strategies and Attitudes Toward Mediation Styles

Goldfien, Jeffrey H.; Robbennolt, Jennifer K. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, Jan. 1, 2007

Recognizing that lawyers have great influence over the choice of mediator, the authors set out to determine what effect their conflict orientations have on their decision. They started with the premise that mediator behaviors fall on a continuum from almost completely elicitive to almost completely directive (these roughly coincide with facilitative and evaluative styles). They then decided to use the Thomas-Kilmann Mode Instrument (TKI) to determine the conflict orientations of the volunteer participants, who were 68 upper-class law students. The participants also completed a survey about their preferences in mediator behaviors and styles.

The study found that the most highly preferred styles were creative mediator behaviors, followed by elicitive behaviors. This runs contrary to the belief that lawyer preferences of mediators will tend to narrow the field to evaluative mediators using directive behaviors. More likely, lawyers will continue to look for a variety of behaviors and styles.

11 E Adams Street, Suite 500, Chicago, IL 60603

  • 312.922.6475
  • info@aboutrsi.org
  • © 1998-2025 RSI
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

To give you the best possible experience, this site uses cookies. If you continue browsing, you accept our use of cookies and agree to our Disclaimer, Privacy & Copyright policy.

Learn More