Resolution Systems InstituteResolution Systems InstituteMenuDonate
  • Home
  • About
    • Overview
    • Mission
    • People
    • History
    • Awards
    • Careers
    • Support RSI
  • Services
    • Program Administration
    • Program Design
    • Research and Evaluation
  • Our Impact
    • Child Protection Mediation
    • Evaluation of a Child Protection Mediation Program
    • Eviction Mediation
    • Foreclosure Mediation
  • Resource Center
    • Overview
    • Court ADR Basics
    • Guide to Program Success
    • Mediation Efficacy Studies
    • Model Surveys
    • The OPEN Project: ODR Party Engagement
    • Peer Review Tools
    • Special Topics
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • The OPEN Project
  • Donate
Combined ShapeBack to search results

Should Lawyer-Mediators be Prohibited from Providing Legal Advice or Evaluations?

Alfini, James J.; Clay, Gerald S.. Dispute Resolution Magazine, Jan. 1, 2004

The authors take opposite sides of the issue of whether lawyer-mediators should be able to provide legal advice during mediation. James Alfini argues that lawyer-mediators should be prohibited from providing legal advice or evaluations because: 1) the mediator cannot be sure that legal advice is accurate and current, 2) mediation risks becoming over-regulated if legal advice needs to be regulated, and 3) the giving of legal advice interferes with the parties' self-determination. Gerald S. Clay argues that lawyer-mediators should be allowed to use their expertise because it conforms to the parties expectations and it allows the parties' to make the most informed decisions.

The author is a member of the RSI Board of Directors.

11 E Adams Street, Suite 500, Chicago, IL 60603

  • 312.922.6475
  • info@aboutrsi.org
  • © 1998-2025 RSI
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

To give you the best possible experience, this site uses cookies. If you continue browsing, you accept our use of cookies and agree to our Disclaimer, Privacy & Copyright policy.

Learn More