Resolution Systems InstituteResolution Systems InstituteMenuDonate
  • Home
  • About
    • Overview
    • Mission
    • People
    • History
    • Awards
    • Careers
    • Support RSI
  • Services
    • Program Administration
    • Program Design
    • Research and Evaluation
  • Our Impact
    • Child Protection Mediation
    • Evaluation of a Child Protection Mediation Program
    • Eviction Mediation
    • Foreclosure Mediation
  • Resource Center
    • Overview
    • Court ADR Basics
    • Guide to Program Success
    • Mediation Efficacy Studies
    • Model Surveys
    • The OPEN Project: ODR Party Engagement
    • Peer Review Tools
    • Special Topics
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • Donate
Combined ShapeBack to search results

Protecting Confidentiality in Mandatory Mediation: Lessons from Ontario and Saskatchewan

Hamilton, Jonnette Watson. Queen's Law Journal, Jan. 1, 1999

In this article, the author argues that the confidentiality rule adopted by Ontario and privilege legislation adopted in Saskatchewan for their mandatory civil mediation programs may lead to unpredictability in their application. Ontario's Rule 24.1.14 "allows for significant judicial discretion in balancing the public interest against the future credibility of the mandatory mediation process." The Saskatchewan statutory privilege is on the face a "blanket privilege," but has the potential of exceptions being read in on a case-by-case basis. The author argues instead for a model statutory provision that addresses the problem of unpredictability.

11 E Adams Street, Suite 500, Chicago, IL 60603

  • 312.922.6475
  • info@aboutrsi.org
  • © 1998-2025 RSI
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn

To give you the best possible experience, this site uses cookies. If you continue browsing, you accept our use of cookies and agree to our Disclaimer, Privacy & Copyright policy.

Learn More